EVENT Mar 05
Abstract days left 0
Viewed 431 times

Can the Other Speak? Productive Difficulties in Ethnic and Postcolonial Literature (NeMLA 2020) (NeMLA 2020)

Organization: NeMLA
Event: NeMLA 2020
Categories: Postcolonial, American, Hispanic & Latino, Comparative, World Literatures, African-American, Colonial, Revolution & Early National, Transcendentalists, 1865-1914, 20th & 21st Century, African & African Diasporas, Asian & Asian Diasporas, Australian Literature, Canadian Literature, Caribbean & Caribbean Diasporas, Indian Subcontinent, Eastern European, Mediterranean, Middle East, Native American, Scandinavian, Pacific Literature
Event Date: 2020-03-05 to 2020-03-08 Abstract Due: 2019-09-30 Abstract Deadline has passed

Our 2020 NeMLA panel emerges from Gayatri Spivak’s seminal question, “can the subaltern speak?” Following Spivak’s response to this question, we will investigate moments when subalterns cannot speak or have difficulty speaking. Our inquiry into these moments will build on and sharpen conversations about otherness with respect to literary texts and beyond.

More precisely, our panel calls for papers that examine attempts at representing "others" who surface in ethnic and postcolonial literature. For our purposes, we define others as different from modern subjects. They are distinct because modern subjects resist the past and tradition by reducing others as their irrational and primitive inferiors who require integration into or expulsion from civilized society. 

Our shared point of inquiry will be these literary others who evade, fracture, and undermine efforts to understand them. We invite proposals that promise to unpack this dynamic by examining contexts--such as ethics, postcoloniality, globalization, civil rights, post civil rights, and neoliberalism--that inform representations of putative inferiors. Our panel will scrutinize how these frameworks shape, complicate, and limit the comprehension of others. 

Pursuing this matter further, we welcome papers that consider how the gaps and fissures of representing literary others disrupt structures of domination and subjugation. This line of inquiry will serve as a critique of power systems and encourage recognition of others without assimilation to modern subjectivity. 

We encourage panelists to compare literary others to comparable figures in historical texts, newspapers, magazines, and other non-fictional sources. Our comparative readings of fiction and non-fiction will complicate conclusions about understanding otherness.

Submit a short bio and a three hundred word abstract through the NeMLA submissions page before September 30, 2019: https://www.cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/17988


Misun Dokko